@FatherMcGruder @TheDailyShow – to be honest it never occurred to me to have a national, public list.

@mgsledge – anyway to cite that, without mentioning Tutu called on Trinity to let them enter the property, is profoundly dishonest

@mgsledge – yes but since they didn’t “forcibly” break the law it doesn’t really apply. Tutu couldn’t come out against nonviolent CD

@aristarchan – the point is he’s an Archbishop in that church. And that the reporter simply lied and switched his position from pro to anti

@FatherMcGruder – not aware of one. We should be like the gov’t – give good stories to sympathetic reporters, boycott hostile ones

@aerdil @ctlong1 – oh there’s been some honest reporting on OWS. In fact I’ve been surprised by how much.

@Newyorkist @ctlong1 – I really think we should have a list of reporters we’ll never talk to again. Reward those who report honestly tho

3

@LutherBlissetts -“we have invited leading artists and writers to design a new banknote and invent a new currency for a post-Capitalist age”

@athenadrakou – I say communism is the basis of society; debt is the perversion of a promise

2

@CultureCultJeff -yes the only useful principle we ever got from the military is redundancy. If there’s anything you really need, bring two

1

@omegamarie – at the end I got to talk to Katha Pollitt and Steve Lukes at a party, also Louis Sass, Ted Mooney… that was the fun part

@PlutocracyFiles – both I’d say. Also one was clearly more than half insane. Long long and rather boring story

@MatthijsAKrul -actually Mauss considered himself a revolutionary socialist but those guys’d dismiss that as he worked in the coop movement

@GregDowney1 – #3 always interpret diffs of interpretation as profound moral flaws (disagree with my reading of Mdm Bovary? You’re a racist!

@GregDowney1 – #2, create a list of 27 ways to be wrong and only listen to opponents’ argument long enough to decide which to plug them into

@GregDowney1 – rule #1 was: if there are 2 ways to interpret an opponent’s position, choose the one that makes them seem the most stupid

@GregDowney1 – I once tried to compile a three-part list of how to engage in stupid sectarian styles of argument

@dissenterested – i could imagine an entirely diff science of distribution that could operate in a free society but yes why call it “Econ”?