@geeceevee @dominichills5 Yeah exactly the “propagandists” have intelligent debate with varying views; the “mainstream” media has right wing ideologies shouting you down like fascists

@NewsAMorgan Look everyone knows what a pre-interview is *supposed* to be for. Shocking though it might seem to you most people aren’t stupid. Your insistence that anyone who thinks it might be more complex is just doesn’t understand the basics is condescending. Goodbye.

@NewsAMorgan Don’t you realize how obvious this kind of behavior is? Whenever I point out how much BBC is state propaganda the invariable result is some kind of bullying personal attack: it’s so consistent.

@NewsAMorgan I didn’t go after anyone specific, I just responded to your condescending tweet.

@NewsAMorgan pre-interviews serve multiple purposes, obv., but my own experience & that of other lefties who’ve done them is that frequently, political censorship is one. Some friends have been given direct warnings: eg. ‘please no Tory-bashing we’re coming up for funding review.”

@NewsAMorgan when I read your tweet I immediately said “right. This guy has to be a media professional with a paid interest in claiming this.” And sure enough, when I checked your profile, you were.

@Twundit @Palomar_qfwfq pretty much all pre-interviews I’ve done with BBC or Sky consisted of subtly figuring out what I was going to say and telling me what they wanted and what they didn’t. Occasionally it’s not so subtle.

@ForosLucius I thought “just as biased but pursues different strategies” is exactly what i first proposed.

@ValentinaBass40 actually he’s been dropped by his publisher and college but I have no idea about BBC.

@ForosLucius I think the propaganda damage done by legitimating #BBCNews is more dangerous. First of all, far more people think BBC is non-propaganda. Second, BBC has done way more destructive things – viz the “Corbyn is an Antisemite” campaign

@inside_lemon @nomthepom yeah he’s defining “mainstream” as “reflecting the interest or attitudes of SOME elite”. That’s a very unusual definition of “mainstream.” Pretty much no one else uses the word that way. If he’s trying to change the meaning of the term, he’s unlikely to get far.

@dominichills5 actually RT has simply reversed the cold war tactic the US used successfully vs the USSR: rather than promulgate a single line (which the USSR tried, unsuccessfully), just find homegrown dissidents on the other side and throw money and airtime at them.

@Jonatha05469026 maybe they have some cultural left stuff but that’s just cover. It’s like the Guardian. i’m considered extreme left. They’re always asking me to talk about cultural issues, NOT political ones. Then they just censor or ignore me.

@Jonatha05469026 you think BBC is overtly on the left? Wow. Not the News! During the election when an impartial body found both the Labour & Tory platform economically unfeasible, BBC News mentioned it for the Tories once, for Labour, 37 times.

@nomthepom well different elites have different interests, and also, elites have to have a news source that’s reliable for themselves – which is why reading the financial papers will often get you the best information

@PafkoBosh good example! Yes the Russians tend to be more free-form and improvisational, which is bad if you’re a spy (they have notoriously incompetent spies) but much better if you’re in the news business.

@stumpygutbucket yeah they can be good; but before the Saudi regime told Qatar they’d basically invade unless AJ changed its editorial direction, they were so much better

@SirPaulHartley @BBCNews oh. how recently? I did agree to do a spot on Radio 4 because I figured it was different management than BBCNews. Hope I didn’t make a mistake.

@ubi_stories @BBCNews I suspect in this case it’s a little of both. I also noticed how only “free market advocates” are allowed to scream, take extreme positions, & openly mock others on mainstream US news shows.

3

@ubi_stories @BBCNews it’s like me when I go back to America. I remember even a few years ago turning on CNN a couple times at the gym, and there’d be some libertarian screaming or someone being wildly abusive & I was always, “has something changed or was it always like this & I didn’t notice?”

4

@WorbsIntoWords @SamuraiElf no just didn’t learn to suppress your enthusiasm, which often does makes people type too fast

@alueda @SamuraiElf logically this would have to refer to some part of “our” (including your) brain other than that which was writing that tweet, which did seem to know the difference

@paniq what? expressed the facts in a way that shows I care deeply about the matter? Yeah. Guilty as charged. Or do you somehow think this is all about yourself, whoever you are.

@bygeorgist @ExtroSpecteur it’s very hard to say. I suppose they could threaten her family. I don’t know much about her.

@Timlagor @Exarchopou1os @rkhamsi thank you – yes exactly. I mean, I guess I thought the process of my first saying to myself “my god that’s so totally offensive, who is this person anyway… oh. Well, okay, maybe not AS totally offensive as I thought…” was slightly funny.